Comprehensive documentation: provides a thorough understanding of project requirements and progress.Clear structure: makes it easier to plan and allocate resources.Let’s look at the pros and cons of “Waterfall style”:
This can lead to slower response times and limited client involvement at certain stages of development. Once a phase is completed, it's challenging to make changes without going back a few stages. Unlike Agile, the Waterfall methodology follows a more rigid structure. This way, the team can focus on staying within the boundaries and follow a clear path. It also requires a comprehensive understanding of the project scope. This method requires strong upfront planning and documentation. In the Waterfall method, projects follow distinct phases, such as:Įach phase might have its own team and specific deliverables.